Wednesday, May 30, 2018

"I WILL SURVIVE"


Sa halip na sa Naga City ilipat ang Mayon Volcano, ayon sa kagustuhan ni Mocha, eh mas bagay kung sa SC-Padre Faura ito ililipat para doon ito MAGPASABOG sa June 5, 2018, puede? ORAS NA, MAGKAISA, PEOPLE POWER NA!!!  #WeFightWithSereno  #Du30Resign  #DefendTheConstitution  #QuoWarrantoIbasura 

Monday, May 28, 2018

PALACE DEFENDING SOLGEN JOSE CALIDA


Halatang AANDAP-ANDAP na ang bagsik ng dila ni spookman hurry rookie para ipagtanggol si SG (security guard) kalibog porke halata siyang NABAKLA re violation of CODE OF CONDUCT ni sg kalibog, 'di ba?
Eh kase, 'yung IPINAGKAIT at patuloy na IPINAGKAKAIT na due process para ke exCJ Maria Lourdes Sereno eh kabalintuna sa kasong SALASALABAT NA PANDARAMBONG at pambababae ngayon ni kalibog porke dotard's sychophants (SIPSIP) still insist on due process for kalibog - DASALASANANSENS (that's a lot of nonsense)!!!
Nararanasan ngayon ni kalibog ang BAGSIK NG MEDIA at SOCMED sa pagsiwalat (EXPOSED) laban sa kagahaman ng kanyang pamilya re P150-M gov't contracts ng kanyang SG agency (VISAI) at dahil dito'y pagpahayag siya ng kanyang hinagpis - 'I'll defend myself in the proper forum, not media'
- HANUDAW???
Maliwanag na walang INTEGRITY (malinis-na-budhi) si kalibog, kagaya rin ng kanyang among adik-adik na si dotard - you are DOOMED (ganting-kapalarang ipinalalasap n'yo sa PILIPINO)!!!

Sunday, May 27, 2018

PADRE FAURA ANG BAGONG EDSA


Meron na rin bang executive power ang SC ngayon, sa halip na local gov't, porke bakit pinadi-demolish daw sa utos ni SC aso justiis lokong beermanen 'yung SYMBOLISM ng KABAONG ng TINDIG na pinaglalamayan sa sidewalk ng Padre Faura sa tapat ng SC?
Eh binalaan daw kasing kakasuhan ni aso justiis beernamen, bilang chairman ng 2017 Bar exams, 'yung 1724 bar passers na naniniwalang UNCOSTITUTIONAL ang quo warranto petition in removing impeachable officers like exCJ Maria Lourdes Sereno, kung makikipag-LAMAY daw sila sa BUROL ng PAGKAMATAY NG DEMOKRASYA sa PHL 'tsaka hindi rin daw sila papayagang mag-attend ng oath taking, see???
Sa aming interview ke Sister Teresa (May 28, 2018) sinabi niyang makikipag-negotiate sila, kasama si Fr Robert Reyes, sa Director ng PGH upang 'wag paalisin ang BUROL ng demokrasya sa sidewalk na nasa gawing block sakop ng PGH compound, hindi ng SC, porke hindi naman umano nakakasagabal ang BUROL sa mga dumaraang pasyente ng ospital. ABANGAN ANG RESULTA!!!

Thursday, May 24, 2018

CALIDA, WIFE'S SECURITY AGENCY BAGS P40 M CONTRACT FOR LUNETA, PACO PARK


Batay sa ating kulturang Pilipino: NOTHING CAN BE PRESERVED THAT IS NOT GOOD.
'Yun kasing ALINGAWNGAW ng isinampang quo warranto ni sg kalibog sa SC kaya napatalsik (UNCONSTITUTIONALLY) ng mismong SC si ex-CJ Maria Lourdes Sereno eh UMIGKAS (repercussion) at sumipa pabalik ke kalibog at NADAMAY ang buong pamilya nito, ARAGUY!!!
Ang KAMALASANG tinatamasa ngayon ni kalibog sanhi ng pagsunod sa adik-adik niyang amo na si dotard (re his filing of quo warranto vs exCJ) eh dahilan para LUSUBIN siya ng mismong asawang si Milagros sa opis nito porke nabisto ni Mila na KULASISI pala ni kalibog aka OGRE (a monster that eats humans) ang kanyang batang-batang EA, o hah!!!
A la kadena-de-amor (sunod-sunod) na lumantad ang KASAKIMAN ni kalibog, katuwang ang buong pamilya nito, porke nahalungkat ang kanyang katusuhan sa negosyo dahil nabistong sila ang nagmamay-ari ng security agency na me kontratang P40M (kada taon?) to provide security guards and cctv operators at the Luneta and Paco Parks, see?
Parang kinopya ang istilo ni exVP nognog Binay, 'di ba, Sen nangsi? MGA MANDURUGAS GASgasgasss!!!

Saturday, May 19, 2018

SOLGEN PRESSURED TO BARE SALNs


Sinampahan kahapon ng negosyanteng si Jocelyn Marie Acosta (Jozy Nisperos), founder ng TSM - Silent No More, si Solicitor General Jose Calida ng GRAFT & MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT sa Office of the Ombudsman.
Naging controversial si Calida, aka kalibog, porke ang opis niya ang kapural, sa utos ni panggulong dotard, para patalsikin bilang CJ si Maria Lourdes Sereno ng mismong Supreme Court.
Kinalkal ni Jozy ang records from SEC at nabisto niyang pag-aari pala ni kalibog (60%) ang Vigilant Investigative & Security Agency Inc (VISAI) and the rest of the shares belonged to other members of family, so maliwanag na ito'y CONFLICT OF INTEREST, bukod pa sa IMMORALITY porke nagme-maintain din ng batang-batang kulasisi na parang apo na lamang nito.
Hinihiling ni Jozy sa OMB na ipakita ni kalibog ang kanyang SALN mula 2016 hanggang sa kasalukuyan, kagaya rin ng ginawa niya vs Sereno na nagresulta sa pagka-quo warranto (removal) nito bilang CJ ng SC.

Tuesday, May 8, 2018

#WELCOMEBACKCJ


Matatandaang pumayag noon si CJ Sereno para kusa itong mag-indefinite leave TO PREPARE FOR SENATE TRIAL, hindi ng quo warranto vs CJ na isinusulong ng kanyang colleagues sa SC, kasama ang biased 6 justiis na ayaw magsipag-inhibit.
Porke ngayong araw, May 9, 2018 (Wednesday) ganap na alas-7 ng umaga eh BUMALIK sa kanyang OPIS ang CJ dahil ayon sa CJ her leave of absence IS OVER, ayon sa Rappler.
An'dami kasing TARBAHO ang dapat na asikasuhin ang CJ porke she has always place her responsibilities ahead of her personal feelings, o 'lamobayon aso justiis teriring de cashtro?
Sigurado kaming NABIGLA ang SC sa a la 'KISAPMATA' aksiyon ng CJ re #WelcomeBackCJ para siya ang muling magpe-PRESIDE sa mga sessions/hearings ng SC, see!!!

Sunday, May 6, 2018

OUR BEST PRESIDENTS WEREN'T LAWYERS


"The first thing to do, let's kill all the lawyers" - Shakespeare's King Henry VI.
Shakespeare was ahead of his time, most politicians are lawyers, a profession that involves defending lies as truths under oath, o 'di ba spookman hurry rookie? aTONGni panyelo?
Pero sa isang banda, we don't need more lawyers, kasi nga eh the few scientists and engineers we have are immigrating.
Our best presidents weren't lawyers, bagkos ang mga abogadong naging pangulo, 'gaya ng tatay ni BBM at ang kasalukuyang si Dotard, mga MANDARAMBONG, DIKTADOR at MAMAMATAY-TAO!!!

Friday, May 4, 2018

COALITION FOR JUSTICE: DUTERTE WILL GET TO APPOINT MORE JUSTICES


Sereno may be removed from her position as early as May 11—if reports citing unnamed insiders are proven true.
Integrated Bar of the Philippines president Abdiel Fajardo told Philstar that the SC may rule the quo warranto petition immediately executory.
"She has to file a motion for reconsideration with the [SC]" Fajardo said, adding: “In which case, the chief justice will be out of the court in the meantime that her Motion for Reconsideration is under consideration.”
Should Sereno’s appointment be nullified—and the chief justice ousted from her position—it will open up a new vacancy at the high court.
Associate Justice Presbitero Velasco Jr. is scheduled to retire in August while Associate Justice Teresita De Castro is due to retire in October.
Duterte has already appointed four out of the 15 justices of the court: Samuel Maritres, Noel Tijam, Andres Reyes Jr., and Alexander Gesmundo.
Although her appointment to the court will be nullified, Sereno’s past decisions will “remain as valid as a matter of equity,” said Fajardo.
The IBP head however said that should the SC deny Sereno's appeal, "I’m afraid there is no other judicial recourse for the chief justice."
He said: "All other solutions would have to be political."
SECURITY OF TENURE UNDER THREAT
Former SC justice Vicente Mendoza told ANC on April 30 that should Calida’s quo warranto petition—filed beyond a year since Sereno’s assumption of office—is granted, it will “undermine the security of tenure guaranteed by the constitution to public officers who are simply removable by impeachment.”
The 1987 Constitution provides that an appointed justice to the SC is allowed to serve until reaching the mandatory retirement age of 70.
Sereno was appointed chief justice at the age of 52, and, if she hurdles the attempts to unseat her, will hang up her robes in 2030, giving her 18 years as chief justice.
Mendoza stressed: "You cannot bring a suit for quo warrant to test the validity of the title or right of a person who is impeachable by quo warranto—except by impeachment."
The retired justice also warned that a quo warranto proceeding against Sereno will “ultimately subvert the independence of the judiciary."
PRECEDENT FOR FUTURE PETITION
Sereno's legal counsel opened the hours-long oral arguments on April 10 with a challenge to Associate Justice Teresita De Castro: Would she, and the rest of the sitting justices, be willing to also testify under oath should a quo warranto—grounded on missing SALNs—be filed against them?
The chief justice’s legal counsel, Alex Poblador, in their opening statement stressed: “If allowed to do so, what will stop the solicitor general from filing similar petitions against any sitting Justice, based on any offense, whether impeachable or not, on the theory that such offense can somehow reflect on his integrity and probity?”
Poblador stressed that if the quo warranto is granted, jurisprudence will be entered into court that will allow the bringing forward of a case, based on missing SALNs as indicator of lack of integrity.
“Since according to the petitioner the qualification attached to a member of this court not only when he applies for appointment but throughout his tenure, and since the petitioner also claims that it is exempt from the prescriptive period for quo warranto petitions, the solicitor general can file those quo warranto petitions at any time during the tenure of a sitting justice,” Poblador said.
“What was designed as a procedure to remove impeachable officers that would be used sparingly only by Congress, because it is so difficult and cumbersome to undertake, can now be undertaken before this Court, the Court of Appeals, or even the Regional Trial Court, by the Solicitor General at any time,” he added.

STATEMENT OF SENATORS LEILA M DE LIMA AND ANTONIO 'SONNY' F TRILLANES IV IN THE QUO WARRANTO CASE FILED BY THE OSG AGAINST THE CHIEF JUSTICE


(4 May 2018)
We, as Senators of the Republic of the Philippines, and as citizens and taxpayers, filed an Opposition-in-Intervention in the Quo Warranto Petition filed by the OSG to oust the Chief Justice, an impeachable officer of the Republic. We did so in order to remind the members of the Supreme Court that they are treading on dangerous grounds when they move to even entertain such a Petition. Today, we are vehemently protesting any attempt to hastily resolve the Petition before the resumption of the session of Congress and before the latter has had the opportunity to transmit the articles of impeachment and, thereafter, conduct further action in accordance with the Constitution, including, if deemed warranted, the conduct of an impeachment trial.
President Jose P. Laurel, in one of the Decisions he penned early in his tenure as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court in 1936, laid down immortal words, the wisdom of which has not only endured, but has become part of the basic DNA of our government – that is, that “the separation of powers is a fundamental principle in our system of government.” “It obtains,” he said, “not through express provision but by actual division in our Constitution…,” with each department of government having “exclusive cognizance of matters within its jurisdiction, and is supreme within its own sphere.” As far as the Legislature, or Congress, is concerned, he expressly stated that it “controls the judiciary to an extent” and “exercises the judicial power of trying impeachments.”
It is a landmark decision, and passages from it are routinely memorized by law students. Because if one is to understand one fundamental thing about the Constitutional structure of our government, that is it in a nut shell. It is sacred, and to forget it is to forget the faces of our forefathers; and to betray it is to betray one of the very basic components that holds up this social contract between the State and its people.
Once in a while, a branch of government needs reminding: Sagrado po ang kasunduang ito sa pagitan ng pamahalaan at ng taumbayan, at sa pagitan ng bawat sangay ng pamahalaan. Kung babastusin at lalabagin ito ng kahit na anong sangay ng pamahalaan, ipinagkanulo na rin nila ang Taumbayan. Dahil ang paglabag sa prinsipyo ng separation of powers ay kanser na kakalat at papatay sa kabuuan ng Sambayanang Pilipino.
Usually, it is the judiciary that does the reminding. In the exercise of the power of judicial review, it tells the executive or the legislature or any other agency in the bureaucracy if it has overstepped its powers. “Grave abuse of discretion” ika nga.
Ngunit paano kung ang Kataastaasang Hukuman mismo ang kailangang paalalahanan?
Kapag nilabag ng Judiciary ang eksklusibong kapangyarihan ng Kongreso na magtanggal sa pwesto ng mga impeachable officers, lalampas na po kayo sa boundary ng kapangyarihan ninyo, at nag-tre-trespass na po kayo sa teritoryo ng Lehislatura.
Make no mistake, this is no ordinary “boundary issues”. To take cognizance of the Quo Warranto Petition and, worse, to expedite action on it in order to prevent and pre-empt Congress from exercising its powers of impeachment is one of the worst, if not the worst, act of betrayal that a Supreme Court can commit because it is tantamount to the Supreme Court signing its name on the death warrant of our democracy.
It is a betrayal of the Filipino people who ordained and promulgated the Constitution.
It is a betrayal of the honor and life’s work of former members of the Supreme Court, such as Justice Cecillia Muñoz-Palma, who envisioned a Supreme Court that will serve as “the true and faithful “guardian of the Constitution, protector of people’s rights and freedoms, and repository of the nation’s guarantees against tyranny, despotism, and dictatorship.”
It is a betrayal of the Supreme Court’s duty to preserve and protect the powers exclusively vested in other branches of government.
It is a betrayal of the integrity of the Supreme Court itself.
We refuse to watch silently while the Office of the Solicitor General bids the Supreme Court to sound the death knell of our democracy. ###

Wednesday, May 2, 2018

COALITION FOR JUSTICE (CFJ)


Leaders of 57 people organizations trooped to the Senate on Wednesday to formally call on the senators to ask the Supreme Court to suspend its quo warranto proceedings and let the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno proceed.
In a letter addressed to individual senators, the Coalition for Justice appealed that lawmakers should stand up against grave miscarriage of justice being perpetuated by the SC which took cognizance of the quo warranto petition filed against Sereno by Solicitor General Jose Calida.
“If the Senate, by tradition the more independent chamber of Congress, is defanged of its powers of oversight, Philippine democracy is imperiled by the possible green light for a weapon that the executive department can use against independent judicial officials and those in charge of constitutional bodies,” it said.

GRANTING THE QUO WARRANTO PETITION IS ILLEGAL, A BETRAYAL OF DEMOCRACY


The Supreme Court trampled on the Philippine Constitution and betrayed its primary duty to the Filipino people when it violated Chief Justice Ma Lourdes Sereno’s right to due process.
The Supreme Court abandoned its chief mandate to ensure an independent judiciary by accepting a bankrupt Quo Warranto petition and refusing to inhibit five openly biased Justices.
The Judiciary’s Code of Conduct decrees resistance against attempts to subvert judicial independence. It orders judges to be impartial. The five justices bowed to Congress’ impeachment summons. They attacked the Chief Justice in proceedings that refused her right to question accusers. Doing so, they prejudged the Chief Justice and betrayed the Court’s position as a co-equal branch of government .
We repudiate as illegal a ruling tainted with these shameful acts.
The Quo Warranto action against CJ Sereno, filed beyond the one-year deadline, is itself illegal and unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has affirmed many times that impeachment is the only mode for removing an impeachable officer.
In accepting this farcical petition, it crushes constitutional checks and balances. It threatens every Filipino citizen’s right to a free, impartial justice system.
The State derives its power from the people. When the key instruments of the State conspire to subvert the Constitution and democracy, the people must rise as the last bastion of our rights and freedoms.
We challenge the Supreme Court: Pull back from the brink. Do not be a party to the death of judicial independence. Heed the Constitution. Obey the Code of Judicial Conduct. Compel the inhibition of the Biased 5. Dismiss the illegal Quo Warranto petition!
If the Biased 5 will not inhibit, then we call on them to resign. The people will not accept any Decision tainted by gross injustice and Justices who cannot act with justice.

Tuesday, May 1, 2018

DUTERTE PREFER TO KEEP QUIET ON PH-KUWAIT ISSUE


Sa loob ng halos 2-taon panunungkulan ni Dotard eh ngayon lang siya nahimasmasan sa kanyang kahibangan porke kitang-kita na NABAHAG ANG BUNTOT sa aksiyon ng Kuwaiti gov't laban sa kanya which is prevailing over him making him aware that leadership and governance are not measured by popularity.
Napagtanto niyang hindi nakukuha sa BOLDYAK, PAGBABANTA at PAMBABASTOS para hindi siya papatulan ng Kuwaiti gov't re pauuwiin sa Pilipinas lahat, repeat LAHAT, ng mga OFWs na nagtatrabaho roon? GO AHEAD!!!
Sapat ang bilang ng mga MANGGAGAWANG PINOY na balak pauwiin ni Dotard mula Kuwait para manguna sa pagpapatalsik sa kanya porke UMAALPAS NA ANG NGITNGIT ng mga nasa hanay ng mahihirap na Pinoy at kitang-kita ang EBIDENS sa rally noong nakaraang Labor Day (May 1, 2018) sa Mendiola, see?