Friday, June 29, 2018

"TO PRAY FOR HEALING SO THAT THE PRESIDENT'S HEART COULD BE HEALED" - BISHOP ALBERTO UY


Pati ba Simbahang Katolika eh hati na rin batay sa "LAMBOT" ng pahayag ni Obispo Alberto Uy laban sa PAGLAPASTANGAN ni panggulong Duterte sa Diyos?
Bilang Katoliko, you got it all wrong Bishop Uy because there's nothing wrong with Digong's heart porke isa siyang tunay na BALIW, BALIW, BALIW dahil ang tunay niyang diyos eh si Xi Jinping, see?
Ngayon, para magkaro'n ng healing sa pagkabaliw ni Digong, if ever he could still be healed, eh sa MENTAL HOSPITAL siya kelangang ma-TOP OVERHAUL.
Pero sa tingin namin, he looks TOTALLY HOPELESS AND HELPLESS, peksman!!!

#Du30Resign  #WeFightWithSereno  #DefendTheConstitution

Tuesday, June 26, 2018

DUTERTE'S LAST RESORT


Upang umiwas o itago ang umiigting at patuloy na PAGGUHO ng gobiernong Duterte eh MAHAHAYAP NA PAGDUSTA sa Simbahang Katolika ang ginagamit na PAMBABASTOS ni panggulong Digong to appear confident, ngunit ang totoo'y TAKOT-NA-TAKOT na siya porke nababanaag na ang kanyang KATAPUSAN - ALIS D'YAN!!! #Du30Resign  #WeFightWithSereno  #DefendTheConstitution

Thursday, June 21, 2018

BULWARK OF DEMOCRACY NO MORE


The Supreme Court has officially become a willing tool for the furtherance of injustice and persecution in the country.
With the same vote of 8-6, the highest court of the land denied the motion for reconsideration filed by former Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno and, thus, affirmed with finality its earlier decision ousting her as the top magistrate of the land.This means that no one from the eight justices who voted to grant the petition for quo warranto initiated by Solicitor General Jose Calida, despite its utter unconstitutionality, changed his or her mind.
They don’t give a damn if the country’s justice system is destroyed. They wanted her out, by hook or by crook.
On the same day Sereno’s appeal was denied, the same Supreme Court ruled in another case to junk the civil suit aimed at recovering billions of pesos plundered by the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos, his wife Imelda and their known cronies.
The ruling affirmed a 2011 Sandiganbayan decision dismissing the said civil suit because of the alleged failure of the Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) to prove that the Marcoses and their close associates conspired to steal from the public coffers.
June 19, 2018 was a day we live in infamy as the powerful Gods of Padre Faura dealt the Filipino people serious and fatal blows. It was Jose Rizal’s 157th birthday. But with everything that is happening with our God forsaken country, even our national hero will surely decline to celebrate his special day.
It was a double whammy to the nation as the so-called guardians of our freedoms and liberties became willing protectors of past and present tyrants and notorious thieves.
It is the same Supreme Court who ruled that Ferdinand Marcos can be buried at the Libingan ng mga Bayani. Just because he is a former president and soldier. Notwithstanding the well-documented atrocities committed during his tyrannical rule.
About 70,000 were put behind bars after being branded as “enemies of the State.” Around 34,000 were tortured. 3,240 had been salvaged which is now commonly known as extra-judicial killing. Hundreds disappeared. Hundreds more were raped and sexually molested. And for the so-called honorable men and women in Padre Faura, he is entitled to a hero’s burial. Revisionism perpetuated no less by highest court of the land.
It is the same Supreme Court who has wasted all the gains and accomplishments of the Aquino administration in its anti-corruption crusade. Allowing Juan Ponce-Enrile to be released on bail on a supposedly non-bailable offense. Dismissing the plunder and other cases against Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo without giving the Ombudsman prosecutors ample and reasonable time to present their evidence.
It is the same Supreme Court who legitimated Rodrigo Duterte’s martial declaration in Mindanao and its extension. Despite the absence of factual and legal basis and even if the constitutional safeguards and limitation were blatantly violated.
It is the same Supreme Court that refused to grant succor to Senator Leila de Lima who has been incarcerated on invented, legally-defective and politically motivated drug charges. The lady senator whose only sin is to opposed the murderous and anti-people policies of the incumbent president is languishing in jail on what acting Chief Justice Antonio Carpio described as the “grossest injustice in recent history.”
The Supreme Court has become a refuge for scoundrels like the Marcoses, Arroyos, Enriles and Dutertes of this world while turning a blind eye to the persecution of De Lima and the injustice suffered by Sereno. It has effectively turned the Philippine justice system into an apparatus of oppression.

Monday, June 11, 2018

IMPEACHMENT AS A TOOL FOR AUTHORITARIAN POLITICS


With due respect, fairness demands that you cite the constitutional provision permitting quo warranto as a tool for removing impeachable constitutional officials.
The framers of the (lousy) Cory constitution cannot remove from therein a provision that does not exist.
The only constitutional provision specifically sanctioning the removal of constitutional officials is Sec. 2 of Art. XI - Accountability of Public Officials-to wit:
"The President, the Vice-President, the Members of the Supreme Court, the Members of the Constitutional Commissions, and the Ombudsman may be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, culpable violation of the Constitution, treason, bribery, graft and corruption, other high crimes, or betrayal of public trust. ALL OTHER PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES MAY BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE AS PROVIDED BY LAW, BUT NOT BY IMPEACHMENT"(emphasis supplied for easy reference of the controlling provision which the cabal of 8 justices did not follow in the removal of Sereno.)
This constitutional provision is very clear and emphatic that only the enumerated high officials from the President down to the Ombudsman may be removed by impeachment. All other public officials than those enumerated can be removed by quo warranto. Therefore, by misinterpreting a clear provision needing no construction, the cabal of 8 justices did not follow any law but breached the Constitution, committing a "legal abomination." Merci! (By: cogito728sum - DISQUS)